Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Appl Lab Med ; 6(2): 486-490, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-990735

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While it is presumed that immunosuppressed patients, such as solid organ transplant recipients on immunosuppression, are at greater risk from SARS-CoV-2 infection than the general population, the antibody response to infection in this patient population has not been studied. METHODS: In this report, we follow the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in patients with COVID-19 who are undergoing exogenous immunosuppression. Specifically, we studied the antibody response of 3 solid organ transplant recipient patients, 3 patients who take daily inhaled fluticasone, and a patient on etanercept and daily inhaled fluticasone, and compared them to 5 patients not on exogenous immunosuppression. RESULTS: We found that the solid organ transplant patients on full immunosuppression are at risk of having a delayed antibody response and poor outcome. We did not find evidence that inhaled steroids or etanercept predispose patients to delayed immune response to SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSION: The data presented here suggest that solid organ transplant recipients may be good candidates for early targeted intervention against SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/immunology , Immunocompromised Host , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Administration, Inhalation , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/isolation & purification , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Serological Testing/statistics & numerical data , Calcineurin Inhibitors/adverse effects , Etanercept/adverse effects , Female , Fluticasone/administration & dosage , Fluticasone/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
2.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 155(3): 343-353, 2021 02 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-913143

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Serologic detection of prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is needed for definition of convalescent plasma donors, for confounding SARS-CoV-2 presentation, and for seroprevalence studies. Reliable serologic assays with independent validation are required. METHODS: Six SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays from Beckman Coulter, Euroimmun (IgG, IgA), Roche, and Siemens (Centaur, Vista) were assessed for specificity (n = 184), sensitivity (n = 154), and seroconversion in a defined cohort with clinical correlates and molecular SARS-CoV-2 results. RESULTS: Assay specificity was 99% or greater for all assays except the Euroimmun IgA (95%). Sensitivity at more than 21 days from symptom onset was 84%, 95%, 72%, 98%, 67%, and 96% for Beckman Coulter, Centaur, Vista, Roche, Euroimmun IgA, and Euroimmun IgG, respectively. Average day of seroconversion was similar between assays (8-10 d), with 2 patients not producing nucleocapsid antibodies during hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies may be less reliably produced early in disease than spike protein antibodies. Assessment of convalescent plasma donors at more than 30 days from symptom onset and seroprevalence studies should use assays with defined sensitivity at time points of interest because not all assays detected antibodies reliably at more than 30 days.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/therapy , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/standards , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Plasma , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Seroconversion , Seroepidemiologic Studies , COVID-19 Serotherapy
3.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 10(4): 426-431, 2021 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-851812

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is poorly understood in pediatric patients due to frequent asymptomatic and mild presentations. Additionally, the disease prevalence in pediatric immunocompromised patients remains unknown. METHODS: This cross-sectional study tested convenience samples from pediatric patients who had clinically indicated lab work collected and an immunocompromising condition, including oncologic diagnoses, solid organ transplant (SOT), bone marrow transplant, primary immunodeficiency, and rheumatologic conditions or inflammatory bowel disease on systemic immunosuppression, for the presence of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). RESULTS: We tested sera from 485 children and observed SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence of 1.0% (Confidence Interval [CI] 95%: 0.3%-2.4%). Two patients were positive by nasopharyngeal (NP) swab Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), but only 1 seroconverted. Patients with oncologic diagnoses or SOT were most likely to be tested for COVID-19 when presenting with respiratory illness as compared with other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Seroprevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in immunocompromised children was similar to that of an immunocompetent pediatric population (0.6%, CI 95%: 0.3%-1.1%), suggesting an adequate antibody response. However, none of the patients who tested positive for antibodies or via NP RT-PCR had more than a mild illness course and 2 patients did not have any reported illness, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 may not cause a worse clinical outcome in immunosuppressed children, in contrast to immunocompromised adults.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , Adolescent , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Infant , Male , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL